But with those
feelings of uncertainty aside, this would probably be one of the more
interesting things (to me) that I have done so far in my life :)
The Topic & its Relation to this Course:
The course for which
this blog has been setup for is GEOG3057 Global Environmental Change. This blog
is about agriculture and the environment. It aims to investigate the
relationship between agriculture and our global environment by understanding
the different ways in which agriculture has contributed to environmental change
in various aspects on the global scale and how the global environment (changing
as it is) has and is predicted to affect agriculture. Ultimately, as the title
of this blog suggests, I would like to find out a little more about what we
should do to address the challenges agriculture faces in the years ahead.
To guide myself and the reader along, here are some
questions I hope to answer through the weeks ahead (through reading and
reviewing of academic literature):
These are probably
subject to change as I read up more and more about this topic!
Past:
How has agriculture
evolved?
What impact has this
evolution had on the global environment?
To what extent has
modern agriculture been detrimental to the environment?
Present & Future:
What influence does
the global environment have, and is predicted to have, on agriculture in light
of recent climate change?
What is the way
forward in the field of agriculture in light of climate change and other global
issues (E.g. Poverty, Health, Conservation, Animal welfare etc.)?
Personal Rationale for this Topic
(Forgive the story-telling here… just like to share a
little about my interests toward this topic. Perhaps it might strike a chord
with some you ;))
A reason why I chose
this topic is because it is the convergence of two of my biggest interests:
health and the environment (hence my training as an Environmental Biologist I
guess). What makes these interests so personal to me is that any conclusions I come
to about them could and should affect my everyday living in terms of my food
choices etc. Afterall food and the environment are the two most basic things
which facilitate our survival.
Through the past two
years in university, my own reading and exploration alongside taught modules in
university have brought me through a whirlwind of thoughts and emotions in
relation to this topic: excitement (when I think I was fortunate to read about/
find some wisdom/truth that should be shared to help others), confusion/despair
(when I seem to find contradicting
pieces of evidence and can't figure out how to make sense of them- this has
been probably the most dominant emotion so far). Here's an example: recently, a curve-ball has
been thrown at the dominant school of nutrition. It says that the 'paleodiet'
(i.e. more good quality animal meat & fat and less bad quality
carbohydrates) is actually what makes a healthy lifestyle(when coupled to
exercise of course). However from the environmental standpoint of view, this
does not seem to be feasible/ responsible given the amount of environmental
resources (e.g. fertilisers → plants → animal feed → humans) and the amount of
pollution that results (e.g. greenhouse gases, nitrate pollution in the land
etc.). Hence does this mean then that if every one (all 7 billion (!) people on
Earth) were to subscribe to the healthy paleo diet, our Earth would basically
would crumble? Put it plainly: if one tries to be healthy, does that mean he
necessarily is harming the environment and vice versa?
Perhaps we are
looking for a missing link between human health and environmental health (which
once again converges on the topic of agriculture) or perhaps somewhere along
the way there has been inaccuracies in the theories. This is something that I
would really love to delve further to clarify these questions that I have. In
any case, I would say that because this topic is something I'm
convicted/enthusiastic about through various influences (academic, cultural and
ethical), it is inevitable that I have
already formed a pre-understanding/hypothesis/stand on the matter. It is as
follows:
"Since Man is
dependent on and part of nature (environment), whatever is best for nature
would be best for Man(health). Hence the development or nature is not contrary
to the development of human society i.e. the two are not mutually exclusive.
(If it helps, this is a 'co-evolutionist' ethical perspective on the
human-environment relationship.)"
However, I hope this
blog would be a platform for me to test this hypothesis, and not so much to
prove it. I hope not to let my
pre-understanding shape the evidence but
allow the evidence to correct my pre-understanding where necessary i.e. take the
evidence as objectively as possible. The reason why I am making this
preunderstanding/ prejudice of mine explicit is that I hope you, the reader can
keep it in check and guide me in this area.
On a side note...
here's another reason why I am excited to start this blog:
Through my
university education, I have enjoyed being exposed to scientific knowledge and
ways of thinking. In the process, I have felt my own thought-processes
developing more than ever before. However, I am still unable to communicate
them well to others (especially in speech). Hence this is a skill which I would
really love to hone in the coming 3rd year- and what a better way to practice
than to blog regularly about a subject I love! So I hope you would join me on
this journey and please do comment on my posts.. any critiques would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks again for
visiting this blog and reading my lengthy first post! (I hope to become more
succinct as the days go by haha...)
go joy go.
ReplyDeletetradeoff is the order of the day
"Since Man is dependent on and part of nature (environment), whatever is best for nature would be best for Man(health). Hence the development or nature is not contrary to the development of human society i.e. the two are not mutually exclusive. (If it helps, this is a 'co-evolutionist' ethical perspective on the human-environment relationship.)"
ReplyDeleteDid you mean development *of* nature in your hypothesis?
@jye: ah check out my new post. it has quite a bit about trade-offs... but then proposes something potentially not necessitating it :)
ReplyDelete@joel: and yup that was a typo, my bad.
very nice informative and personal first post!
ReplyDelete